Remarks of Farooq Kathwari
February 25, 2006 at EPIIC Conference at Tufts University, Medford,
Massachusetts
It is a pleasure to share my thoughts with you and an honor to receive
the 2006 EPIIC Dr. Jean Meyer Global Citizenship Award.
In December 2005 I had the opportunity
of leading a team of six Directors of Refugees International, which
I chair, to the earthquake affected areas in South Asia. As you may know, in less than
40 seconds over 70,000 people lost their lives, thousands are disabled
and millions homeless in a mountainous area during the winter months. It
is hard to comprehend unless one visits and feels the tragedy.
The visit to Muzaffarabad, the
capital of the Pakistan administered Kashmir, and being met by
hundreds of people including the Prime Minister of the region and
all his key associates reflected the association of my family and
me to the areas of Kashmir under both Indian and Pakistan administration. As a child, my father had left Srinagar,
which is in Indian administered Kashmir, where our family comes from,
to Muzaffarabad where his two week permit to return was cancelled. We
joined him one year later except my older brother and sister stayed
with our grandparents in Srinagar as they were in school. Our family
thought that we would be re-united in less than a year. We finally
were able to go home after ten years while our father had to spend
another seven years there. My mother did not see or have any contact
with her two children for ten years and my father had no contact
with his two children or parents for seventeen years. Our family,
like many in the Kashmir region, has been part of this conflict. And
on a wider scale, the growth, development and the focus of leadership
of entire South Asia has been negatively impacted. The December
2005 visit to Muzaffarabad was in a Pakistan Airforce helicopter
and while in the region the pilot advised us that we were about 15
minutes from Srinagar. That made me realize the impact, the
foolishness and the tragedy of this conflict, especially to people
like my parents who were so close to their children and yet so far. Leadership
of the region, in my view, has failed in their responsibility to
end this conflict and has not been held accountable. In fact, the
environment created was such that the more irresponsible the leadership
acted, the more it was considered patriotic and right. Obviously
this is not limited to South Asia. We see it all across the world
from the East to the West. I feel strongly that it is the responsibility
of the leadership to understand that their main job is to work for
the welfare and dignity of their people and to do that they must
use all their resources to end or reduce to the maximum conflicts.
It is the leadership’s responsibility to shape the debate and
if they fail to do so the debate is taken over by people with louder
voices and most of the time with agendas that divide people rather
than unite them. I believe that one of the biggest challenges leaders’ face
is to manage conflicts. As CEO of Ethan Allen, one of my main responsibilities
is to ensure that the leaders in our enterprise devote their energies
on constructive matters and not on areas that will create conflicts
and thereby impact creativity and growth.
In the early 1990’s the
conflict over Kashmir turned violent severely impacting the lives,
dignity and welfare of all the communities, especially in the Kashmiri
speaking areas with reported deaths of over 60,000 persons, mostly
young.
With my personal background and reasonable access to all sides,
I felt that I could help the parties as an un-official interlocutor
and more importantly help in changing the paradigms of the last 58
years which were based on the basic premise that Jammu and Kashmir
as it existed in 1947, is an indivisible unit. India, Pakistan, and
some leaders claiming to speak for Kashmir, have asserted that the
whole region, as it existed in 1947, must belong to them alone. The
United Nations, in its resolutions, also appeared to endorse the
indivisibility of the erstwhile State. Unfortunately, these positions
have led to great loss of life and destruction. It was important
that these rigid and unrealistic positions had to be debated in the
open and more realistic ideas developed.
I came to the conclusion that
to address this major challenge of changing the rigid positions
of the parties we needed to have a Study group consisting of persons
with interest in South Asia, with diverse expertise and acceptable
to the parties. In 1996 we formed such a group and called it the
Kashmir Study Group, today consisting of twenty-five members, with
the objective of interacting with the people in the region and,
through these interactions, to develop ideas. I
also realized, being a marketing person and spending twenty years
in repositioning an American classic brand that we needed time and
that our message had to be clear and must be conveyed repeatedly
in the region and outside the region. Therefore, we developed a position
that the Kashmir dispute must be resolved peacefully, the outcome
must be perceived as honorable by all sides, and the solution must
be implementable. A feasible solution needs creative and practical
approaches. In the final analysis, it is the parties themselves who
need to consider and discuss various options. The Kashmir Study Group
papers of 2000 and 2005, referred to as ‘Kashmir-A Way Forward’ and
available on the www.kashmirstudygroup.org website,
have depicted the historic, demographic, geographic and linguistic
background of the Kashmir region. These studies provided various
options for dispensation of the Kashmir region that could generate
solutions that are implementable and can also be perceived as honorable
by the concerned parties. Also included as part of these studies
are memorandums prepared for the Kashmir Study Group by Dr. Hurst
Hannum, Professor of International Law, at the Fletcher School of
Tufts University.
Any initiative such as this is
viewed with suspicion by many people. In fact, most good ideas
go through stages – first, rejection,
then toleration and finally acceptance. I am gratified to state that
the ideas developed by us through interaction with the parties have
reached the stage between tolerance and acceptance. A great
deal of discussion is taking place in the region on ideas to resolve
the Kashmir issue. The parties have moved from their rigid positions
and are discussing the need for flexibility. Many concepts are being
suggested, and the ideas proposed by the Kashmir Study Group of self-governance
of the various regions of Jammu and Kashmir are among the most debated
ideas. Both President Musharraf of Pakistan and Prime Minister Singh
of India have talked about looking for creative ways of solving the
Kashmir issue. In fact, today February 25, 2006 the Prime Minister
of India is conducting a round table discussion on Kashmir in New
Delhi where he has invited persons of various perspectives from the
Indian administered Kashmir region to join. While some important
elements from the Kashmir region are not participating mostly on
issues of format, meetings like this are part of the process and
a few years back would have been unthinkable. In mid-March a meeting
in Pakistan is planned where leadership from the various regions
of Jammu and Kashmir from both sides of the Line of Control, reflecting
various perspectives and religions, are planning to meet. The main
topic of discussion is the concept self-governance. In December 2004
a meeting of persons from the Kashmir region from both sides of the
Line of Control was held in Kathmandu, Nepal. This was the first
such meeting in fifty eight years where persons belonging to different
regions, religions and perspectives participated with approvals of
both India and Pakistan governments. I was requested by the participants
to moderate the meeting. In a few hours time this diverse group reached
a consensus statement calling for an end to violence by all sides,
finding an honorable and feasible solution and to work for the welfare
and dignity of the peoples of the region.
I believe the leadership of the region has a great
opportunity to move forward. Courage and wisdom is required on all
sides. There exists an opportunity to work out solutions that could
satisfy the vital interests of the peoples of the Kashmir region,
India and Pakistan. The main responsibility of the leadership is
to end conflicts so that the people of the South Asia region have
an opportunity to live in peace and with dignity.
Back to Honors
|